- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Ventoura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article about an app that is not notable. 162 etc. (talk) 15:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It already had one reference, and I added a newspaper reference. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - actually it had zero sources, as both are bad links. So now it has one. Onel5969 TT me 19:05, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lack of sources show this is non-notable app.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 22:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't yet meet WP:GNG. One source is a dead link. Another is produced by the subject of the article, so lacks independence. So only one source remains, and that isn't significant enough coverage in my view. Meticulo (talk) 02:13, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't seem to be notable. The app is long gone now, and the article is mostly sourced to the company's own website, which is dead by now. Looking at the article history, a large portion of it consists of personal insults towards one of the employees, some of which were apparently severe enough to be hidden even from administrators. JIP | Talk 03:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not significant, there are 100,000s of dead apps out there. Article body reads as if the app is still available. Teraplane (talk) 08:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Two references from reliable sources (one a news site, the other a newspaper). Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:05, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:HEY. I agree with Eastmain, and further, I have significantly expanded the page, cleaned up and added numerous IRS sources. In my view the page now well satisfies WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 23:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete almost al the sources discuss it only in context of other similar apps. The ones discussing it specifically are PR-style reviews, e.g. "The European summer is a really important opportunity for us, " DGG ( talk ) 09:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.