The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vermilion Editions[edit]

Vermilion Editions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No independent RS on this particular company (there are other entities with the same name), and no record this film production company has ever produced anything. The director is also not notable (and I have nominated him and his non-produced film for deletion too). Michitaro (talk) 12:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable. There's so many web hits for the publisher of the same name it's hard to be certain, but there doesn't seem to be any RS coverage for this film company. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:19, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lack of reliable sources speaking about this firm in any detail would seem to have it fail WP:CORP. The creation of ths article seems closely tied to that of I Am A Curious Gaijin. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. Article does not even assert notability, and lacks third-party sourcing. --DAJF (talk) 04:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.