The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica White[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appointed municipal department head for New Orleans so doesn't pass WP:NPOL. Most of her coverage appears to be related to a single controversy, so not entirely sure that White meets WP:GNG GPL93 (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being the appointed head of a municipal service department is not an automatic inclusion freebie per WP:NPOL, but the article is not referenced anywhere close to well enough to get her over NPOL #2. The stuff that is actually reliable source media coverage is parked entirely on a single controversy, which just makes her a WP:BLP1E rather than a person who's passed the ten-year test for enduring significance, and virtually everything outside that controversy itself is citing blogs and primary sources that do not count as support for notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:25, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete department heads at the city level are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.