The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vientiane United[edit]

Vientiane United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable. I couldn't find a reliable source indicating that this club is for real. This may be due to a lack of sources in a Latinized alphabet, and perhaps sources in Laotian are available which prove me wrong. However, I had no problem finding sources for other Laotian clubs, making this one dubious. The previous two incarnations (one speedied, one prodded) were created by other users. Konekham Inthammavong, one of the players claimed in such a previous incarnation to be a member of Vientaine United actually plays for a different team, Lao Bank FC. [1]. The article Vientiane United F.C. also has been speedy deleted three times as a hoax. The only club I could find was Vientiane Capital FC[2]. Establishing once and for all whether this team exists and plays in the Laotian premier league may put an end to these creations and deletions. Fram (talk) 09:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a hoax. Delete unless an actual source is provided and I am proven wrong. Lao League claims that it's one of the teams who play in the league: we probably need to find a reliable source for that list, too. Morwen - Talk 12:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:N Dengero (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.