The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I PROD'ed the other article per the comments here. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 13:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Families 2[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Virtual Families 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Inadequately sourced article about a non-notable video game. Unable to find any reliable sources. - Mr X 01:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 01:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to bundle Virtual Families, the original game, since that does not seem much better. Unless or course more stronger sourcing can be found.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. There's a lot of websites that provide game reviews and are considered reliable sources, but these games have almost no coverage and therefore aren't notable. If one was notable, I would suggest merging the 2 articles, but neither is notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:43, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.