The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What a stupid decision you all made. It was notable emulator and is even more known now. Why even have this site if you won't let a page grow.
Someone revert this deletion Zorklis (talk) 14:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vita3K[edit]

Vita3K (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable emulator, fails WP:GNG. Prod was removed but article author is incorrect about GNG, it needs multiple published sources for notability, not just a single primary source. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:51, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

go ahead, delete if it is all you want.Biel Bestué (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.