The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Do you have a direct link to the article for the pressdisplay coverage? Your link goes to a viewer with about 40 articles, and Firefox isn't finding "viwawa" on the page. Pagrashtak 15:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
CommentWP:NOTE requires "significant coverage", which means it has to be more than trivial. The provided source is only a trivial mention. --Peephole (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Calling Viwawa "Asia’s fastest growing social gaming network" isn't trivial. Besides, the other source I linked to is a nine paragraph article on the subject. Epbr123 (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a link to the full article and not just the preview. Pagrashtak 21:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We need independent articles, not press releases. --Peephole (talk) 03:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Viwawa (...), announced on Tuesday..." - It's a press release. So far, the only source calling this company "Asia’s fastest growing social gaming network" is Viwawa themselves. Sources/links provided in the article are not satisfactory; for example, the Infocomm123 "Special Article" is a glorified advert. Marasmusine (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't able to read the linked-to articles. All I was able to find were press releases, and they all say "Asia’s fastest growing social gaming network". That said, you might have better luck on Chinese-language sites since the company is from Singapore and caters to the rest of Asia. SharkD (talk) 07:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam, no reliable sources. --Peephole (talk) 15:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability big time. §FreeRangeFrog 20:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.