- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:08, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
VsTortoise[edit]
- VsTortoise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a TortoiseSVN plug in for Microsoft Visual Studio. I don't see any indication that it was ever a popular plug in. There is also hardly any coverage in reliable sources. I consider software as products and this doesn't satisfy WP:NCORP. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As already has been said this is just a small SVN plug-in for a developer framework. No indication of notability. It fails WP:NSOFTWARE and WP:GNG. This tool has/had 0 coverage anywhere, except for a few blogs with install instructions and some download links. It also seems to be still in beta. According to its github page it seems to be abandoned since January 2015. It has been created by a single-purpose account. It should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not even worth a redirect, as Dead Mary notes - David Gerard (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - don't see any notability in the article. AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZeta 13:46, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - yup, not close to notability, nothing of substance to merge. W Nowicki (talk) 22:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.