The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 03:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now, nominate after the end of October if appropriate. Otherwise someone is just going to create a new revision of the same article and the work will be effectively lost. Besides, the subject does already seem notable. Lots of sources out there just waiting to be added. — xDanielxT/C 06:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If it keeps being recreated then it can be salted. Oysterguitarist 14:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, In theory the article should be permissible since adequate sources exist, but sufficient care has not been taken to avoid this article becoming little more than an advertisement. See WP:CRYSTAL. –SESmith 07:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there shouldnt even be a discussion about it, an article for this song title has been speedily deleted at least four times. The song is not a new single - its an old studio song. There is no truth whatsoever in it being released.Rimmers 19:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.