The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

W00tstock[edit]

W00tstock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for failure to have significant coverage in independent reliable publications. It fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Currently sourced to one deadlink Wired article, and two related sites. All of the mentions I found were of the nature of soandso is appearing or did appear at a w00tstock, there were a couple of videos, and listings for the performances and that's it. No significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 03:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, some coverage in reliable sources

• Ken Denmead. "W00tstock FTW!". Wired: Geek Dad, 20 October 2009.
• Austin L. Ray. "Five Reasons Why You Should Go to w00tstock". Paste Magazine, 19 June 2010.
• Mike Selinker. "'Juzzling' Debuts at w00tstock". Wired, 6 May 2010.
• Nicole Campos. "W00tstock 2.4 PWNS Thursday Evening Events at Comic-Con 2010". LA Weekly, 28 July 2010
• Sheeley, Tyler (2011). Geek vaudeville: creating community through w00tstock (M.A. thesis). University of North Dakota.

And a large number of notable people have performed at the event. Antrocent (♫♬) 06:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Meets WP:GNG. Sources include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above - Meets GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per above, and while link to one of the reliable sources might now be a deadlink, that does not change the fact there was coverage in a reliable source.Agent 86 (talk) 23:58, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.