- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- WWVW-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject lacks the necessary WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Coverage is trivial at best. ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 23:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Topic is a part of a subset of obscure (but encyclopedic) information about an obscure subject. If we are to delete this page, it will create a hole in that subset of information. So either merge this (and all of the other pages in that subset that are effectively no different from this) into some larger page, or keep MNewnham (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.