The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WalletConnect[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Some coverage in RSes, but it's all passing mentions - I couldn't find any in-depth coverage that would meet WP:NCORP. Current substantive ref is in TechCrunch, which is yellow-rated on WP:RSP as not really usable as indicative of notability. Other coverage is press releases or cryptocurrency sites. Previous versions of the article were overwhelmingly promotional in tone, and substantially written by a series of SPAs. I'd be happy to be shown wrong, per requirements of WP:NCORP - David Gerard (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, and Technology. David Gerard (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with nom, more crypto fluff. Non-notable, passing mentions as explained. Oaktree b (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.