The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 00:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Watchtime[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article written as an Advert. Sources are primary and fails WP:NMEDIA and WP:GNG Hagennos (talk) 19:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. (And for transparency reasons: Yes, I obviously am the page author) the issues addressed have been corrected, the publication is the only watch magazine available at newsstands in the US and regularely cited/quoted within horology-related content of the English version of Wikipedia, its only comparable Asian competitor Revolution_(magazine) does have a page. Thanks for reconsidering. Rruegger (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Subject lacks secondary independent coverage establishing notability. Meatsgains^(talk) 19:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics ^Talk 07:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per above, insufficient coverage in secondary RSs. Also, a failure of WP:PROMO. Rentier (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.