The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Web2Carz.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably promotional. All but the single first ref are there to back up the claim that the website generates favourable results for buyers. Also, I don't think being listed at 523 is not that notable. It hasn't received any awards or high-quality coverage in the media. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 05:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet WP:CORP. No depth of coverage, and nothing inherently notable about the company Heywoodg ^talk 09:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:12, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.