- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by Hit bull, win steak (talk · contribs); rationale was "G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP: Accusations of criminal activity by group, w/o evidentiary support." Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weetos clan[edit]
- Weetos clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD-contested by IP. No coverage in independent sources, which fails WP:GNG and WP:V. elektrikSHOOS 18:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I'm withdrawing my nomination, as I'll be tagging that article for speedy deletion under criteria G3 (blatant hoax). elektrikSHOOS 18:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this nomination open... just in case... -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unreferenced, may fall under G10 speedy criterion. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't think it's a hoax, as there are one or two unreliable mentions on the net. Unreliable by our standard, but probably indicating existence. Definitely not indicating notability, however. Peridon (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.