The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Purgatory[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable future film. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Just a few reproductions of routine announcements. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Well, yeah, pretty much. But anything with that cast is going to get a substantial amount of coverage, even if it is mostly routine. I did find two interviews: [1] and [2]. Maybe someone else can find better than that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 12:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you elucidate a bit more? Did you find more sources? It'd be useful to see them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC) edit: Ah, I see you added a few sources to the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per meeting WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Filming has been confirmed and due diligence shows the film topic as meeting WP:GNG. You simply may have missed these in your own searches, nominator. Kudos to Lady Lotus. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:GNG, reliable sources found to assert notability, such as [3]. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.