The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seems to be a trivial publication with no clear notability. Yellowrooftiles (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete - Reason 1, there were only ever 2 issues, so I doubt there could be much in thord-party sources about it. Reason 2, I can't even see where the article asserts any notability whatsoever. Reason 3, it's nothing but a plot summary. And I doubt anything could ever be written about it beyond this plot summary. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.