The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the page creator would like the text of the page, perhaps to transfer to a more suitable wiki, feel free to ask me or any other admin, and we would be happy to retrieve it for you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wesnoth AI[edit]

Wesnoth AI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Ref list for programmers of the Wesnoth game. I think. Not an encyclopedic article by any definition and something that belongs on the game's sourceforge (or similar) pages. Delete.    SIS  14:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for heavy use of jargon and conflict of interest. Note that the page was created by Wesnoth ai. Alexius08 (talk) 15:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• An an avid Wesnoth fan, either Delete or Redirect to Wesnoth. I don't think this is a conflict of interest as such, more likely someone who's misunderstood the difference between the Wesnoth wiki and Wikipedia. Anyway, it's already on the Wesnoth wiki (which is where this belongs), so we're not losing anything. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - what my prod wasn't enough? :) The redirect is unlikely IMO --Blowdart | ^talk 16:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Raven1977 (talk) 16:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete: fundamentally inappropriate for Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't an instruction manual for coders of a particular game. Randomran (talk) 17:05, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - COI + per Randomran _David^WS _(contribs) 17:21, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Useful but it should be put elsewhere not in wikipedia. --SkyWalker (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete — nothing but a now-to guide, which is not what Wikipedia is about. MuZemike (talk) 19:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - this is a general encyclopedia. Marasmusine (talk) 21:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.