The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Brunswick Football Club[edit]

West Brunswick Football Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable club, with very little content Superflewis (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per my nomination --Superflewis (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with the previous editor. Not notable for a stand alone article. Team is already mentioned under Victorian Amateur Football Association Surfing bird (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no references to prove notability. Delete.--Lester 02:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep or Merge - the club has been around since 1959 - some 49 years - and there are some primary references relating to it from a web search, and one secondary reference, probably incidental, from a suburban newspaper. I suspect the club may have a limited notability, and if some effort was made into searching out old newspapers there might be further reliable secondary references to indicate notability. As it is, it needs to be stubbed and grammar and spelling corrected. Perhaps the basic content can be merged into Victorian Amateur Football Association. --Takver (talk) 12:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More