The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Young Liberals (Australia). (non-admin closure) sst✈^(conjugate) 06:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Western Australian Young Liberals[edit]

Western Australian Young Liberals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per similar discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Australian Young Labor, this page is not independently notable from Young Liberals (Australia). It does not have reliable third party sources and should be deleted and merged into the main article to avoid an unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK. There should not be separate standalone pages for different state branches unless they satisfy the WP:NOTE criteria, which these clearly do not, and even then I would argue Young Liberals (Australia) provides superior context. Paperclip Maximiser (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the related South Australian Young Liberal Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for the same reasons as above. Paperclip Maximiser (talk) 06:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both. I didn't even realise the first one had an article, and neither should have one. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect both to Young Liberals (Australia), although that article is also problematic in that it's just a laundry list of stupid things that Young Liberals have done that have gotten into the press. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
• Redirect both - the West Australian one with a wish list of red links, and not a single cite in 3 years is tell tale enough JarrahTree 11:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as mentioned as this seems best. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.