The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

White Star Dandenong Soccer Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:FOOTYN. at best this team has played 4th division state league. but currently a 5th division side. LibStar (talk) 03:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. A note regarding the nomination - failing WP:FOOTYN is not a valid reason for deletion. Hack (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG, non-notable club. Giant Snowman 17:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Minor club playing well down the pyramid even at state level. No indication the club has ever taken part in any national competition. Fenix down (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.