The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Birdemic: Shock and Terror . j⚛e decker^talk 01:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Moore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find enough references for the subject to pass WP:GNG. Plus, the subject is really only known for the Birdemic: Shock and Terror movie. Even the far more notable director, James Nguyen, doesn't have an article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Bagh

Note: Before nominating these, I asked for comments at Talk:Birdemic: Shock and Terror#Alan Bagh and Whitney Moore.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:59, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. hmssolent^lambast _{patrol records} 00:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I'm not sure, but both may qualify as having a "cult following". They both starred in one of the most famous cult films of the decade. Is that the same thing as having your own cult following? I don't really know. I'd probably just redirect them to the film, but maybe other people would like to comment on the cult angle. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If she winds up in other notable media, then we can give her a page. But at the moment there's just doesn't seem to be enough here to justify her own page. PerryPlanet (talk) 16:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the article on the film itself. wirenote (talk) 17:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.