The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wigan United A.F.C.[edit]

Wigan United A.F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and doesn't pass WP:GNG. Club that played three seasons in the Lancashire League at the beginning of the 20th Century, never played in FA Cup. Besides, the article is mainly about the history of football in Wigan, not the club itself. Perhaps merge that info to Wigan Athletic F.C. if it's not already there. Delsion23 (talk) 17:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Delsion23 (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Delsion23 (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Q1. Has the club played in a national cup (listed in the Blue Column)? YES
Q6. Does the completed article generally meet the notability standards set down in WP:GNG? NO
Q7. Has sufficient time been allowed for the preparation of the article? Suggest appropriate time is allowed for the authors to bring this article up to scratch having regard to the following sources:
  1. 1901–02 FA Cup Qualifying Rounds
  2. 1902–03 FA Cup Qualifying Rounds
  3. RSSSF England - Lancashire League
  4. RSSSF Matches between English and Scottish Clubs
  5. FCHD
  6. The Springfield Park Memorial
  7. This Northern Soul
  8. This Northern Soul
  9. This Northern Soul
There is plenty of opportunity for a reasonable article to be prepared on this notable club - no reason why it should not meet WP:GNG standards. League Octopus (League Octopus 18:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.