The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted (CSDA7). ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 04:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikistock[edit]

Wikistock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Wiki with no claims of notability or meeting WP:WEB. Googling only gets me about 90 unique hits and most of them are either stuff like WikiIndex or other link lists. I didn't find any secondary sources on it and none are provided in the article. Delete as failing WP:ATT. Wickethewok 01:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No sources + no assertion of notability = fails WP:A & WP:WEB = delete. -- Scientizzle 02:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delelte. No sources, seems to be original research, quite likely is an ad or vanity site, no notability. Interlingua ^{talk email} 02:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as web content with no assertion of notability. So tagged. WjBscribe 04:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.