The result was speedy delete. Per G3. No evidence that a player like this exists at all. Even if they do, A7 could be applied since there are no credible claims of importance. SoWhy 17:56, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Page proposed for deletion because: "Hoax. Completely unverifiable, which is impossible if some of the claims in the article were real." Prod contested with one source changed, but the source has no results for this person.[1]. If confirmed as a hoax, should be speedu deleted as a G3 vandalism. Fram (talk) 07:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]