The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
lacks notability and coverage Alan - talk 00:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If sourcing for this appears weak (Did you LOOK in google books search?), try "Bill Skirvin". AfD is NOT intended to be an article improvement process. riffic (talk) 04:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is the second of the nominator's series of AfDs on articles created by one editor. This one also is for an article with a notable topic. There's both SNOW here and cause for a speedy close--a look at the other AfDs will determine how much good faith the nominator is entitled to. Drmies (talk) 04:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong KeepSkirvin is notable person any one who reads the page gets that.--SteamIron 05:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and close Nominator appears to have a misunderstanding of WP:DEL#REASON, WP:GNG and WP:NTEMP. Even a cursory WP:BEFORE finds the coverage and notability the nominator claims does not exist of this man's historic import to American history. WP:BIO is met, and historical notability is quite fine with Wikipedia. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 22:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - connected with many important figures and moments in American history. Bearian (talk) 20:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.