The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William Robillard-Cole[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than a few trivial mentions, mostly to do with the Juno incident, not nearly enough in-depth coverage to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no significant coverage. DrStrauss talk 16:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet WP:GNG. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. — TheMagnificentist 09:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.