The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Wine (software)#Third-party applications. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wine-Doors[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is not notable software also the article is not encyclopedic and the multiple issues template shows other problems with this article Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If there were a handful more sources like this one it might have promise, but that's pretty much all I found approaching an RS. TimothyJosephWood 20:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 23:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 01:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect article makes no clear claim of notability, has no cited WP:RS discussing it, and other than the one mentioned above I can't find any either. If Wine (software) has a section discussing this type of functionality/wrapper/interface/controller/whatever, the ref is sufficient to mention it there (with a redirect from the nominated article). DMacks (talk) 04:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.