The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfenoot[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

essentially nonsense DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep nonsense?, yes it is. But very notable nonsense. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 05:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)).[reply]

I have been won over by superior logic. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Delete, meme with no indication of lasting coverage. The article (and a Google News search) does not even indicate that it was celebrated/marked the first year it was proposed.-gadfium 05:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no lasting coverage. Honestly this is really a WP:TOOSOON situation; Wolfenoot has had a more promising start than 99.99% of the other holiday ideas proposed by children, but it still has a ways to go before it becomes a real holiday in any sense. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no "lasting effect/enduring significance"; coverage is limited to immediate period after its creation. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 04:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.