The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Users are free to start this over on a general topic. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Women in logistics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article with low quality or nonspecific references apparently intended to promote the probably non-notable organisation http://www.womeninlogistics.org.uk/. DGG ( talk ) 20:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree that it appears to be a vehicle to promote an nn organization. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:41, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:41, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Seems to be more about Women in Logistics than it is women in logistics, and that doesn't demonstrate notability.

Women in logistics would be a useful topic though, particularly for its military aspects over the last few decades. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meh - it probably could use a start-over. Bearian (talk) 19:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.