The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism definition. More suitable for Wikitionary Jvhertum 14:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 01:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NEO. Terence Ong 04:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NEO, and discuss with the Wiktionary community before listing it there. I'm not that familiar with their policies, so I don't know if it will be accepted.--Ed¿Cómo estás?Reviews? 04:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in Wikipedia and transwiki to Wiktionary per nom as WP:NEO. Bigtop 17:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neologism. Bucketsofg 22:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this fits a dictionary more than an encyclopedia (or wikipedia for that matter)--JavazXT 14:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.