The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The State (album). (non-admin closure) CTJF83 00:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Worthy to Say[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Attempted redirects have been reverted, but this song is just not notable to merit its own article. Never good when the article itself states how badly it performed on the charts and what little airplay it received. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 09:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to appropriate album article. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. A separate article is not necessary for this song. Nouse4aname (talk) 20:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to album page The State, as it fails notability per WP:NSONGS.--Michaela den (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. The only "notability" (to use the term loosely) of the song was to appear on a year-end list of a single radio station.Agent 86 (talk) 13:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.