The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. nomination withdrawn. Mgm|^(talk) 19:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xangati[edit]

nn org, advert, very possibly by npov. Tried to slip by with several references, unfortunately they are mostly RFCs that have no bearing on the article itself. Fowartehlluz (talk) 02:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google news lists 36 references, including MarketWatch, Business Wire, Earthtimes, Computer Technology Review, IT Jungle, Newstex, XDSL News, Wireless News and Customer Interaction Solutions. The Deal article already listed on the page is independent.
Wikipedia:Notability Guideline states: "If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself." Nominator has not shown that he looked for sources first before putting the article up for deletion.travb (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Closing nominator: I have cleaned up the links since deletion was posted on article. travb (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I edited the original spammy article and brought in references to highly respected trade media that would enable it to pass WP:RS and [{WP:CORP]]. It is hardly a NN company. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination Withdrawn -- still don't feel there's any substance here, but with the ELs cleaned up and better references, it looks okay. Fowartehlluz (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.