The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YAK Films[edit]

YAK Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is dubious. Lone contributor Burnsinstitute (talk · contribs) likely in a conflict of interest. bender235 (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - we, at wikipedia, are a bunch of assoholes. Deb (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, notability is, as the nominator says, dubious. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete - potentilaly notable, but I can only see a single reliable source. The references' format confuses the situation; it appears that there are many duplicates of the same one good source. Bearian (talk) 19:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.