The result was keep as it is neither original research nor unverifable, yet can be made into a decent stub. Bearian 18:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Currently the article is a clear violation of WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. I attempted to find even some cursory source material in an effort to expand on this topic, but was unable to find almost anything but Wikipedia mirrors. This probably isn't a hoax, considering there are news archives with mentions of the animal, but it obviously never caught on enough to maintain notability. A lack of sources to be used for verification and a doubtful notability in modern agriculture leads me to think this should simply be deleted. VanTucky Talk 21:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]