The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, only substantive contributor has agreed to deletion. I hope the experience was not too negative, and would point out that we have a number of articles, including bar chart and statistical graphics, which could use expansion, even if this particular instance is not notable enough for its own article. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yamazumi Chart

[edit]
Yamazumi Chart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software tool created by Toyota, only internal use is asserted in the article and in the references. Prod contested with the talk page statement, Yamazumi Users, please help prove notability by stating that you use the tool in your organisation. That's what I call shooting oneself in the foot, since the call is to users and not professional reviewers who do not work for Toyota. In any case, the only references I found on Google were from Toyota. No secondary sources. Delete.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 10:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I can tell from the tone of the above communication that the creation of this Yamazumi Chart article could become a negative experience. Please be assured that my intention was only to contribute. I don't want to battle with you. Please delete the page from your site as you see fit. Ccoles3 (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

How to challenge this deletion? How to contribute external sources of usage? All avenues to discuss or restore, seem to be looping back here - which is marked as "Do Not Modify" (?) Thanks for your help! I'm not a Wikipedia geek, I don't understand what to do! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.205.209.149 (talk) 17:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]