The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7 / G11 Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yamibuy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There doesn't seem to be enough independent reliable sources that cover this company in-depth. Thus, it is not notable. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 01:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as A7 / G11. Promo 'cruft on a nn website. I requested such; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if the speedy is removed. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. I could no find no sources outside of press release-based and reports of venture funding. Even viewed in best light, lack sources perhaps because it is too new to be notable. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.