- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was procedural close. This discussion was one of a large number of disruptive, retaliatory nominations of articles from PogingJuan (see WP:ANI#Disruptive editing/ Harassment by User:PogingJuan), made in such quick succession that they cannot have individually determined that there is a reason for deletion. If there are other editors in good standing that think this article should be deleted, please feel free to open a new discussion. – Joe (talk) 06:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yampai, Arizona[edit]
- Yampai, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not meet WP:NGF. Subject lakcs WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. Not an encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they disagreed with an edit I made on one of the articles they created.Onel5969 TT me 09:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Shellwood (talk) 14:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Draftify - The basis for the GEOLAND claim above is unclear since GNIS listings do not constitute legal recognition. Newspaper articles mention a railroad station at Yampai Pass that seems to be used as a landmark, but no in-depth coverage of the location itself. Suggest draftifying to give the author an opportunity to demostrate notability. –dlthewave ☎ 19:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- delete There are two Delano OWI photos which clearly show this as a rail spot and not a settlement; it was just a passing siding, which is still the case. Mangoe (talk) 01:42, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.