The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is a weak consensus that while the article does not meet the WP:NFOOTBALL guideline there is sufficient coverage to meet the main notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 07:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yanaki Smirnov[edit]

Yanaki Smirnov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was declined on the grounds that this version of the article is sufficiently different from the one deleted in 2012. However, Yanaki Smirnov has still not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did you look for further sources? (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL) МандичкаYO 😜 17:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Other stuff exists is not a valid argument for keeping the article, and there is a long standing consensus against applying WP:NSPORT prematurely in anticipation of potential future appearances. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, still meet GNG, which for me is enough for keeping the article. K.belev (talk) 21:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter that he fails sport notability guidelines; he meets GNG. МандичкаYO 😜 07:06, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't shown GNG, simply an interview , one other article and a number of short clippings. As the sources are not in English it would help if you could outline what the sources say and help out a bit more than simply reposting the source search, it's not possible for many of us to separate routine transfer talk and match reporting from genuine significant coverage. I am happy to change my vote if this can be shown and take your word on the content of articles, but per WP:BURDEN, not only am I not able to do so because of the language barrier, I am not obligated to. Fenix down (talk) 07:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But it's your duty to actually do a search before you declare someone doesn't meet GNG. Also any literate person can tell whether an article is about the subject even if you can't actually read it (esp using Google Chrome or browser with built in translation). I search for sources all the time in languages I can't read, so I don't see why you're "not able to so," unless you are also blind, in which case I'm sorry for your affliction. МандичкаYO 😜 08:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.