The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yangon derby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unreferenced. Rathfelder (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to add references, or aren't there enough mentions of the subject? GBRV (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG; also see WP:NRIVALRY. At best this is a case of WP:TOOSOON as this 'derby' is less than a year old! Spiderone 22:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:CBALL and WP:TOOSOON. The teams only just played at best one or two professional matches in their histories, to categories this as a "rivalry" is an extreme generalization to say the least. Inter&anthro (talk) 00:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NRIVALRY, it is simply impossible for a rivalry to exist and for it to have received sufficient significant coverage to satisfy GNG after just 2 meetings between the teams. Fenix down (talk) 09:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.