The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was and so deleted blatant copyvio _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 14:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yin Yoga[edit]

Yin Yoga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article has no third-party reliable sources. All links are to YinYoga dot com or personal websites. Had this been created recently, I would've speedily deleted as blatant advertising. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete at this stage I have since removed most of the advertisingmaterial which the nominator rightly points/ed out, and have also removed what appears to be the "how to manual" material, essay and original research. I note also comments made by the editor Bernieclark (who had a prominent conflict of interest link/reference which has also been removed). To my mind this article now particularly suffers from notability - not notability of the fact of yoga or Yin/Yan and the history of these concepts but why Yin Yoga itself is notable. I do not see any information which details that notability and it appears at this stage to just be another form of yoga shala (school) of which there are, of course, 10's of 1000's around the world. Unless that notability issue can be solved this article should be deleted.--VS ^talk 23:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as a blatant copyright violation. So tagged. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.