- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger One ping only 03:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Zak Downes[edit]
- Zak Downes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator based on a single interview and Downes' spell at Arizona United. However, one source is never sufficient for general notability, and he never actually appeared in a match for Arizona, so his time their does not satisfy WP:NFOOTBALL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Only seeing that one interview as evidence of GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.