The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete COI concerns don't bother me as that can be fixed, as could the spammy way this article is written, as an endorsement of the website. What bothers me is the inability to verify the notability of this subject matter via any reliable source. Too new to know if it will or will not ever be notable. It would appear that at this time, it is not. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Dennis Brown. The article is spam, but more important is the total lack of any sign of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - COI/spam may not in itself be a reason for deletion, but without reliable sources the problem is not correctable and the subject fails WP:GNG. -- Rrburke (talk) 00:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.