- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Zeca Schall[edit]
- Zeca Schall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Minimally sourced WP:BLP of a non-winning candidate for local political office. His strongest claim to greater notability than the norm for unsuccessful political candidates seems to be that he got used as a target of alt-right racist attacks against the party that he's a member of, in a subsequent election in which he wasn't even a candidate. This, however, just makes him a WP:BLP1E -- he isn't even the subject of the incident coverage, but just gets namechecked in coverage which is primarily about the attackers. As unfortunate as the incident was, it is not grounds in and of itself for a standalone BLP of him -- it can and should be discussed as a noteworthy incident in the article on the party that did the attacking, but it's not enough to justify a separate article about a person who has no other substantive claim of notability. Bearcat (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:VICTIM also applies, his only claim to notability being this racial incident. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as per Bearcat comment.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.