The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ziad Bashir[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing independent about him but about his company. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 05:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The career section is written like a resume, delete per WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Moreover, the lack of inclined citation challenges credible claim of significance. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 06:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete couldn't find coverage in independent, reliable sources. sami ^talk 08:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article is without reliable sources. Genome$100 (talk) 02:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.