The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 01:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ZwTerminateProcess[edit]

ZwTerminateProcess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

API calls are not of themselves notable, and there is nothing in his article to suggest that the function concerned is exceptional. I PRODed a lot of articles of this type which the contributor has challenged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• ZwTerminateProcess, NtTerminateProcess, and most of other Zakblade2000’s stuff are not useful as standalone articles. These should be merged to one list of Native API calls (though as redirects these entries can certainly be useful). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete because Wikipedia is not an appendix to MSDN. For your information, Sfan00 IMG, you should have probably made a single WP:BUNDLEd nomination for all of these pages, so that we do not have to scatter similar arguments over several pages… Keφr 13:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.