The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was shoot on sight. Krimpet (talk) 15:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism. Wikipedia is not urban dictionary. DarkAudit 03:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: slang dictionary definitions are not best suited to Wikipedia. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 03:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notable slang with non-trivial third party notice from reliable, unrelated sources may very well have a home on Wikipedia, but this should not. Fails WP:NOTE and WP:ATT. --Charlene 06:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems like an nonsense article, inappropriate for encyclopedia usage. Note: The articles AfD links to a non-existent discussion - unsure whats happening there. Regards — The Sunshine Man 15:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. As I have said previously, 90% of neologism articles should be shot on sight. As DarkAudit has correctly pointed out Wikipedia is not urban dictionary. ---Cathal 15:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.