The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: Samoon (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 20:42, Friday June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:Automatic

Programming language(s):Python

Source code available: Standard Pywikipedia

Function overview: added or change interwikis

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): daily

Estimated number of pages affected: 50 edits

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: add and change interwikis

Discussion[edit]

Which interwiki options are going to be used? Rcsprinter (message) 20:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You say your bot has a flag but yet it doesn't. Explain.—cyberpower ChatOnline 20:57, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry :)

@Rcsprinter123 ‎-autonomous option in articles, categories and templates-- Alireza Talk 21:01, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it running without approval at current? Rcsprinter (talk) 21:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ok.I shut it off-- Alireza Talk 21:14, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please pay attention to this request :) thanks--AliReza (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:INTERWIKIBOT carefully; Pywikipedia does not tag interwiki links correctly in the Template: namespace, so this should not be performed. Articles and categories are fine. — The Earwig (talk) 23:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I use interwiki.py for articles and categories (-ns:0 and -ns:14)-- Alireza Talk 10:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can my bot do the test? Regards-- Alireza Talk 13:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The bot has flag in ar,fa,fr,it,nl,ru wikipedia-- Alireza Talk 13:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. Standard interwiki; no issues. — The Earwig (talk) 17:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.