The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, unsupervised.

Programming Language(s): PHP, my classes. C (flexscan, nmap, libopm). Perl (libopm perl interface).

Function Summary: Monitor Wikipedia:OP and add ((Clerk note)) with proxy check information on each report which does not have a template (i.e., hasn't been manually checked yet).

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuous.

Edit rate requested: maxlag = 2

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: See User:ClueBot IV/WPOPsandbox. It is a demonstration in userspace of what the bot will do.

Discussion[edit]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. per clarification of function details on IRC. — madman bum and angel 01:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe fix it so it doesn't have such egregious page-widening? Q ^{T C} 23:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are talking about. Neither Wikipedia:OP nor any of the bot's subpages have been widened (I just rechecked the latest few subpages, but I don't remember any of the subpages being widened when I looked at them after they were created). The bot uses the standard  Clerk note: template, so I can't imagine how it has been widened. You need to be more specific. -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 23:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mybad, on the Sandbox subpage somebody threw in some pre-tags. Missed that section and thought it was the links that were doing it. On a related note, can you rename the links so the contributions and block show up as ( Contributions - Block ) instead of giving the title? ie { Special:Contributions/216.145.90.218 | Special:Blockip/216.145.90.218 ) Q ^{T C} 00:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean on ClueBot? Or on ClueBot IV? If you mean ClueBot IV, then where? -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 01:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well last time I checked this was the ClueBot IV BRFA, and the only Sandbox mentioned here was this page. In the second report after the example, the links to Special:Contributions and Special:Blockip. EG: ([[Special:Contributions/68.46.156.238|Contributions]] | [[Special:Blockip/68.46.156.238|Block IP]]) Q ^{T C} 06:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox was a duplicate of Wikipedia:OP. It was so the bot wouldn't screw up the real Wikipedia:OP during testing. That post you are referring to was by ClueBot, not ClueBot IV. (See it is even signed by ClueBot, not ClueBot IV.) If you want that message changed, I can do that, but you see why that is confusing, asking for a change of ClueBot on ClueBot IV's BRFA? -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 17:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. — madman bum and angel 21:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.