The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

Operator: Galobtter (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 06:46, Monday, July 22, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python (Pywikibot)

Source code available: Here

Function overview: Update Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Drafts. Replacement for Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RonBot 11.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RonBot 11, Wikipedia:Bot requests#Clone_of_RonBot_#11

Edit period(s): Weekly

Estimated number of pages affected: 1

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Replacement for Ronbot 11. The output is almost the same, but the code is a rewrite. Updates Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Drafts based on searches using mw:API:Search of Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable biography. Sample output can be seen at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Drafts.

Discussion

[edit]

Approved for trial (1 full run). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:58, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Headbomb, Trial complete. diff. New additions section is new women drafts since the last Ronbot run. Galobtter (pingó mió) 02:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Galobtter: Notice any issue? Or if you're just recycling code, anyone that knows how that page should be notice any issue? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Headbomb, I don't see any issue with the output; I dropped a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#RonBot_#11_now_GaloBot_4 in case someone more familiar with the page sees an issue. Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:18, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. Well no one complained there, so I'm going to assume they're happy with it. Approved. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:37, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.